What is Nano Model railroading?

Nano model railroading is model railroading at a scale of 1:1,000. How on earth is this possible? Quite frankly, at the moment I don't know how possible it is but the technology exists to do it. So I'm going to have a go.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

More progress I can't photograph (boxcar part 2)

I have a grand total of 4 boxcars on the go now. They really are simplicity itself to put together. I cut these "bodies" to length from a section of styrene strip in a NWSL chopper, made the ends from the grooved sheet with the grooves filed out, cut them to size and glued them to the "bodies".
These simple techniques produced something that really was starting to look like a boxcar so I took the plunge and added doors.
Yes, doors.
Well when I say doors it's more of a piece of .25mm styrene cut into 3.5mm squares and placed where the door would be. But in 1:1,000 scale it looks like a door.
I'll try and post a picture before I head away to Yosemite for a long weekend over the labour day weekend.

Monday, August 29, 2011

It's all rather crazy really (box car part one)

You'll have to believe me on this one. Some of this stuff is really difficult to photograph, so if I say I've done this take my word for it for the moment, OK?
What would you think would be the easiest thing to build in 1:1,000 scale?
A boxcar perhaps?
Thats pretty much what I thought too. So it seemed a pretty good idea to have a go at building a few. Because if I'm going to build a nano freight train, I'm going to need a few. A little bit of research on the internet garnered me a set of drawings and dimensions for a Gunderson excess height car. Excess height cars. I like them. So a great project for a first boxcar model.
A boxcar then. Sections of 3.2 x 4mm styrene strip cut to length.
BUT. (there always has to be a "but" doesn't there) take a look at these railbox pictures notice how distinctive the end is this is typical of all modern boxcar ends. Strips of evergreen are plain ended, so how to re-create it? I remembered something I'd done in T scale with the worlds first T scale freight car the ribbing on the sides was created by finding a sheet of styrene of whatever pattern cut to gondola height size and length and topped off with a thin strip of styrene. It might not be "to scale" but it looks the part. So a similar idea was in order for the ends of the boxcar. I found the narrowest V groove sheeting I had and then widened out the grooves to give the right sort of effect. (You will now understand why photography of this is difficult...)
Surprisingly this was not a difficult task and enough sheet for several boxcars was created in a matter of minutes. As I write this the ends are glued to sides ready to be trimmed when the glue has set firmly. I'm quietly confident that my 1:1,000 scale boxcars will look quite good when finished.

Friday, August 26, 2011

What am I playing at?

I really think that I'll add that as a label for my posts because every time I do something in 1:1,000 scale I have to take a step back.
I started on a caboose last night.
12mm long over the couplers, 9mm long body, 5mm to the top of the cupola, 3mm wide...
What am I playing at?

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Now we get serious (locomotive part 3)

Right, I can't keep putting this off. at some time I have to put a blade to styrene and work on something to test out construction theories.
I have a large supply of styrene sections on hand from previous projects and just happened to have some suitably sized sections in stock. So I set to and cut them to size, glued them together and then shaved them to shape with a razor blade.
That's it. Nothing clever, and yes I did wear a binocular magnifier to do the job. This is a very crude "proof of concept" model. But I believe it shows that this method for locomotive construction in 1;1,000 scale is sound. The secret will be to take it slowly and slice off a little at a time. Sometimes "taking it slowly" is something I fail to do. Anyway, it certainly bolsters my confidence. Especially when I think about the difference between my first and third trees at the weekend. What could loco number three look like?
Photographing it was actually quite difficult to get the white styrene to show the shape I'd carved it to without bleaching it out and loosing all the detail..

A "what am I playing at?" moment

Last night I has another of "those" moments. A moment when it really sets in as to what I'm letting myself in for. So if you'll bear with me I'll explain.
Last night I printed off the drawing of the SD60M at 1;1,000 scale.
Its small.
Smaller than I envisioned. Place two wooden coffee stirrer sticks side by side. That's how wide the engine compartment hood is. Under 3/4" (about 15mm) long and a scant 3.5mm tall.
That's small. I was in a sort of shock.
Strangely though I was comforted to see that the lettering on the side of the hood was quite legible and there was a surprising amount of detail to be seen on the tiny drawing. Much more than I expected.
Then I began to realise that it wasn't all that bad. The calmer more rational side of my mind started to take over and actually start to work out how to create this tiny model.
Lets just say I have some good ideas and I'm raring to go to put them into practice.

Monday, August 22, 2011

The locomotive project (part 2)

Nothing is ever as easy as it seems. Sometimes it's the easiest parts of a project that cause the most problem. Case in point with the SD70MAC project. You'd think with all the information out on the internet I would be able to find a comprehensive set of dimensions out there to enable me to get the model right. Well if you thought that then you're wrong. I haven't found any yet.
What I have found however is a nice set of drawings of an SD60M. I like SD60M's also known as Tri-clops because of the three front cab windows... Not that you're going to be able to make out the three front cab windows on a 1:1,000 scale model when its moving.
So SD70MAC or SD60M? Who knows...

Saturday, August 20, 2011

Nano tree number three

Another tree for the afternoon. This one inspired by this 60+ footer seen from my back yard. The real thing is a bit spindlier and thinner than my version. Crowded around by other trees its difficult to make out the exact shape.
But I still feel that this is quite a convincing portrayal of a tree.
After just three attempts I feel that this technique is very viable for making trees in this super small scale. I can only get better at it. Time wise they don't take all that long to make. I spent more time waiting for caulk, glue and paint to dry than I did making up the armature.
Though I wouldn't consider making every tree for any layout by this method they will certainly make a talking point placed in a prominent position on the layout.

Nano tree No. 2

Right then, as promised here in tree No. 2 for your perusal. Already you can see it's a BIG improvement over the first one. These things are so incredibly fragile the mere act of breathing near them can cause a small bit of foliage to move and destroy the effect. I think I got away with it on this picture, you can make out some bits of bough among the foliage. Bear in mind too that this picture is about three times larger than actual size. So perhaps I'm being too hard on myself. I do though wonder of 30 odd feet is the smallest practical size to model a tree in 1:1,000 scale. I've actually just photographed a 60 foot tree of some type and will see if the increased size makes it easier to model.
So to the Woodland Scenics fine leaf foliage product. Very impressive stuff, even looking at this small piece photographed below you can see that there is the makings of an Oak tree or something similar.
And you thought model scenery in 1:1,000 scale was going to be hard...

My first nano-tree

In keeping with the "warts and all" approach to this blog detailed here is my first attempt at a tree in 1:1,000 scale.
You can't beat having realistic looking trees in your model landscape. Everyone should have them.
While I agree that mass produced model trees are getting more and more realistic (if a bit expensive). There are still people out there using the cheapo bottle brush efforts which saddens me as really nice trees are quite easy to do and they are probably easier to do in the smaller scales like N and Z and T than they are in say O. But this same construction theory holds out in all scales.
Above: The first, and most important thing is to find yourself a tree. This one is the approximately 35 foot tall paper birch in my front yard. Take a picture, print it off and study it.
Next: Find yourself some old multi strand electrical wire. Cut some of the sheathing off exposing the strands (1) and then start to separate them and bend them to the shape of the trunk and branches of the tree (2)
Then: I paint the wire armature with painters latex caulking and then, when that has dried I paint it with colours that suit the bark of the tree. Finally adding foliage in the form of Woodland scenics fine leaf foliage. Which, in this tree, is actually quite disappointing as it has smothered all the branch detail underneath.
A second attempt is called for which I will do right now...
When I get that second one done I will also post a picture of plain woodland scenics fine foliage which also makes very acceptable trees when shaped.

The amazing Nano video show

IDL motors have their own Youtube channel where product demo films are posted. I thought I'd share some of them with you in case you had missed them.
This first one shows what appear to be HO scale people on bikes, cattle and pedestrians all moving on a teeny trains track .
This second one is very, very interesting it shows some Hallmark Christmas tree decoration Trains "motorised" by adding magnets underneath them.
This is as small as it gets. The track size is 85mm x 55mm (3 1/2" x 2" approx) the moving cars are 5mm long.
All amazing stuff.
Ed tells me that in the three and a half years of product development they have moved objects varying is size from 5mm to 60mm in length.
I can see all kinds of opportunities for this technology in your model railroads. In O scale or G scale you could model the inside of a factory or warehouse and feature working conveyor belts moving products around the model.
I'm sure someone (maybe my wife and I) will try motorising the Hallmark decorations to make a unique Christmas Dinner table centrepiece.
The only thing stopping you is your lack of imagination.*
I'm really fired up right now. I'm going to have to go and so some Nano model making.

*"The only thing stopping you is your lack of imagination." I like that. Don't be surprised if that tagline doesn't appear on this blogs title block soon...

New Product News!

Since buying my Nano train kit of parts I've been corresponding with Ed Lopatinsky the CEO of IDL motors, the producers of these "teeny trains" and yesterday he shared with me these pictures (which he has kindly allowed me to share with you) of their latest product they are labeling "TeenyTrack".
This TeenyTrack set is a bit smaller (120mm x 80mm) than the currently available oval of track in the Nano train parts sets that I have. The big difference is that with this new teenytrack the controller electronics are integrated into the baseboard, so that there is no plugging in of wires from the controller to the track. A task that I actually struggled with for a few minutes when I assembled mine. Ed also tells me that the controller can be pre-programmed in their lab to accommodate any kind of motion, completely random, faster-slower, or stop start etc; The price for this piece of miniaturization? About $50
One last point Ed made sure that I stressed is that this product is "Proudly made in the USA"
Edit: Sunday Aug 21st post updated to show the latest versions of the "TeenyTrack" board

Friday, August 19, 2011

A new record?

To be honest I was just a bit surprised yesterday when the page views count for this blog went over 200 in the two days since the blog went live. My blogs don't pick up viewers that fast. I guess that there must be something about really small model railroads that fascinates people. Or perhaps people want to see me fall flat on my face with this adventure.
Thank you for checking in.
So anyway much serious thinking is always going on as I work out the best way to go about working in such a small scale. I've even downloaded Google Sketchup to see if producing locos and rolling stock by 3D printing will be viable in this small size.
The weight of the items is the over riding concern. The items of rolling only have tiny magnets inside them to "power" them, per the linear induction motor system used to make the small trains move. It,s a question of what weight will these magnets bear against the magnetic field of the track and keep moving. Even Ed Lopatinksi, the developer of the system, wonders about this. So I might end up making items of rolling stock in several different materials to find one that works. I have several different materials in line:
1. Thoughts started with matte photo paper or a high quality thin card. This would have the advantage of being able to have a loco livery printed on the paper before folding up to the right shape. The problem being that some folds on the paper might be rather small and awkward to achieve.
2. Architectural foam (Balsa foam or similar). The loco/stock would be carved out of a piece of foam, sealing and painting the foam might add too much weight to the item though.
3. Good old styrene.The thinnest strip possible to save weight made just as you would a larger item of stock but everytime you glue or paint or fill you'd add weight.
Perhaps I'm worrying needlessly about the weight, we'll have to see.
Buildings will be no trouble (famous last words) but if I've made T scale petrol/gas pumps complete with hoses I think I can make buildings and bridges and such like without too much of a problem.
I'm looking forward to having a go at some trees. They were the first thing I did in T scale and I may well find the time to have a go at some nano trees this weekend.

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

The locomotive project (part 1)

Well, if I'm really serious about this scratchbuilding in 1:1,000 scale malarkey I'd better nail my colours to the mast and come up with a project.
To be honest it wasn't all that difficult.
Here it is, the SD70MAC.

The one thing that drew me to this class of loco is the shape. It's nothing but squares. Square engine compartment hood, Square cab, pretty squareish nose. For a first time project in a ridiculously small scale it couldn't get much simpler.
At 74' long the SD70MAC scales out to 22.5mm long in 1:1,000 scale which is a bit shorter than the 25mm of the body of the Nano train chassis. (The chassis also extends to 29mm long over the necessary buffers.)
BUT (and here's the joy of striking out on your own in a new direction with new materials at your disposal.)
If I was to model the loco at 1:900 scale it then works out to be 25mm long! That is such an incredible co-incidence I don't think it should be passed over lightly.
1:900 scale would make things a tiny bit bigger, perhaps easier to work with. It would also be half the size of T scale, to give people a frame of reference.
But then I'd loose the 1:1,000 novelty.
Whatever I do its still going to be blooming small.
Perhaps I'll test my skills out in both sizes.
Now to work out how to actually make the thing.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

The Excitement of the new

I've spent a very pleasant night tonight Googling 1:1,000 modelling. I must say it's been very exciting and enlightening. I've added quite a few useful and inspirational links over there on the right.
As you probably know 1:1,000 is an architectural model making scale. Huge grand buildings fit in the palm of your hand. Architectural modelling has its own styles and construction methods which I'm still researching and looking forward to incorporating in a model. The discovery of Balsa foam opens up some interesting ideas for my structure modelling. I'll be trying to get hold of some in the near future.
The links to some of the models is overloading my brain with ideas for a layout right now. I think I need to go and lay down in a darkened room to let it all sink in.
G'night all...

What I'm up against.

Here we are then, some close up photos of the nano train stock as bought. Complete with a US penny in the background. It's blurred because everything kept shaking as cars went past on the road during the 25 second, f18 exposure. I got fed up of re-taking the shot, due to the vibration. this is the best one... You get the idea.
Lets for sake of argument call this the Coors light train, because that is kind of what I'm put in mind of looking at it. It comes as a loco and 3 passenger cars all based around the same 29mm long plastic chassis. The silver plastic bodies are 25mm long as near as makes no difference and are just a simple push fit on the body. Inside the chassis are 4 tiny magnets, two about 1mm in diameter and the other two about 2mm. I'll delve into the interior workings (!) later in another post, when the roads aren't so busy and I can produce shake free photo for you. These are tiny things. Just how tiny you can judge from the picture below.
Above: Left to right - Z scale boxcar, T scale KiHa 40 railcar, Nano train.
This size is both scary and inspiring. Scary because of the tiny size but it inspires me so much my brain is flowing with ideas on how to build new bodies for these things. But I'll start a whole new post for that soon. For now just take in the size. If you want to buy one go ahead. Here's the link to the site.

Click on these links.

To see the basic Nano train kit of parts running

Tell me you aren't just a teeny bit amazed...

You DO have room for another model railroad!

Three and a half years in the making. These "Teeny Trains" are the latest thing in small model railways. An oval of track supplied in the train set is about 6" x 5".
While undoubtedly toy like at the moment, to see one of these tiny sets run is nothing but amazing.
Why would I try and devote some time with model railroading with such a toy? Well T scale was seen as a toy a few short years ago. Yet now, many successful entertaining layouts have been built and exhibited at train shows amazing the viewing public. I've had a whale of a time with T.
Using RP (rapid prototyping) technology small manufacturers have built up lines of products covering US, UK, Australian, and Finnish prototypes. A variety of stock that rivals Z scale.
So why could this not happen with these "Teeny Trains" or "Nano Model Railroading" as I like to call it?
The mechanics of the how the train works can be discussed at a later date. But for the moment there are two projects that I/we are working on. I say we because my wife took one look at the pictures of the "Christmas train" sets on the Teeny Trains website and said.
"We could do that." So we intend to make our own personalised "train under the Christmas tree" set. While I also have plans to create some modern US outline locos and stock and build some kind of layout for them.
Like some kind of persistant child. I can still hear folks asking "Why"
It's all a question of testing oneself, developing new skills. Working in T scale was probably the most rewarding thing I did. I built a working lighthouse, a T scale petrol (gas) station, and very probably the worlds first items of US outline rolling stock. Things I would never have considered having the skill set to do. But I did them and quite well too. So who's to say I can't do the same with these Nano trains and develop a whole new skill set that might serve we well in other model making fields.
I've no idea how to approach these problems but I'm going to have a go.
So follow this blog and see what happens.